When is research outdated

Credible sources are ones the reader can trust. When writing a research paper, doing research, or reading for background information, writers should ALWAYS use a credible source.

There are several main criteria for determining whether a source is reliable or not. Verify the information you already know against the information found in the source. Credible sources are written by authors respected in their fields of study. This is also a good way to find more sources for your own research. A reliable source is one that provides a thorough, well-reasoned theory, argument, discussion, etc. Scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books -written by researchers for students and researchers.

Original research, extensive bibliography. With that in mind, here are eight ways to tell if a website is reliable. Look for Established Institutions. Look for Sites with Expertise. Steer Clear of Commercial Sites. Beware of Bias. Check the Date. Avoid Anonymous Authors. Answered By: Elyse Wolf. Last Updated: Jan 04, Views: How fast-changing is the field of study? Use the Publication Date custom setting seen on the left side of the search results page: For further assistance with this or other search techniques, contact the Shapiro Library at Toggle action bar FAQ Actions.

Print Tweet Share on Facebook Was this helpful? About FAQs. Link to Question Form. Related FAQs. Powered by Springshare ; All rights reserved. However, I have also encouraged them to look back to see where the new research has come from and to acknowledge the foundation it has been built on. I am always keen to hear about the latest developments in healthcare and work to support the readers of EBN who need and want to know about what is new and important in the health care literature.

Keeping up to date with new evidence is critically important for change. But I wonder how we strike a balance between absorbing recent research and taking into account robust research that preceded its publication by more than a decade?

The two references I have used below, both from the s, would not be included in the discussion at all. If we only consider literature that is recent, and value that more highly than if it is robust, then we will be missing important evidence to inform practice.

Researchers could start asking the same research questions over and over I have seen some of this already in nursing literature and even feel pressured to repeat previous studies all over again to check if the findings still hold true in the contemporary world.

Perhaps that is something to watch for in the future. It is important to keep up to date with current research findings, new innovations in care, recent trends in patient problems, trends in patient outcomes and changes in the social, political and system context of the care we provide.